Peer review of Article Rick. S by Claudia N.
Weblog article peer review form
Weblog Article Peer Review Form A – First Review
Writer’s Name ___Rick Slaathuis____________________________________
Assessor’s name Claudia Nieweg da Silva Marcos________________________________
Date __________25-11-2007_____________________________
Rating Scale: 1 = Yes 2 = Somewhat 3 = No
Rate the article by giving a 1, 2 or 3 for each question. Read the article once to geta general idea of what it is about, then read it a second time to rate it.
1. Is the topic interesting? __2__
2. Is the title original and appropriate? __2__
3. Is the introduction complete? _1___
4. Is the body of the article complete? __3__
5. Is the conclusion well-developed? __3__
6. Is the article well-organized overall? __3__
7. Is the article easy to understand? ___2_
8. Is the article interesting to read? __2__
9. Has the writer plagiarised material? _3___
Finally, read the article a third time and check it for spelling, grammar andpunctuation. Mark any corrections on the article itself then complete the rest ofthe form.
Name three things you like about the article. Interesting to read, subject is contemporary and with a little bit of humour._______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Name Three things the writer should improve. Title, the textlenght and the structure.___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
What is the gist of the article? New way of advertising on the popular website called YouTube_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Do You think this article is good enough to pass the course? Explain your answer. No, the text isn’t enough._______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Give the writer this completed form and the article with corrections.
